找回密码
 马上注册

扫一扫,访问微社区

搜索
热搜: mestrenova
楼主: 上善若水

请教这四种类似结构某个C化学位移的相对大小

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-5-28 16:27:12 | 显示全部楼层

4>3, 4>1

3>2,
1>2

3>1 (-OCO- alpha +56.5; belta +6.5; -OH alpha +49.0, belta +10.1) although 3 is close to 1

4>3>1>2

1 L/ C; h' i k$ m, Q8 a

according to your conclusion,maybe 3 is the  lowest

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 22:02:51 | 显示全部楼层
 Why?
The conclusion is 4>3>1>2.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:13:32 | 显示全部楼层
  On acetylation (OH group was changed to OCOCH3 group), the alpha / c8 Q P9 M: y; N' ~# E7 C2 icarbon will show a downfield shift while the belta carbon will show a ; O6 p4 Q' } z0 P- N8 F2 Jupfield shif.
2 B3 I# |$ J( I/ ?
" R. Q& i1 e5 _2 B7 Y' W See the following article how to revise a structure reported before just using the above rule!
" I. w. L: A1 a! a: Q$ m1 X
; `* k! R% `1 z4 ]One compound with C-6 OH, C-7 OH (compound IV in the article):  chemical shift values of C-6 79.3 ppm, C-7 76.2 ppm were known.
; |9 n" \4 ]% Q8 Q; `* A. f% n
! z4 e5 i* b* X; D JAnother compound with one OH group acetylated: it could be C-6 OAc, C-7 5 `& h# `0 k; [4 o6 U3 [$ }OH (compound I in the article) or could be C-6 OH, C-7OAc (compound II ~$ R5 L/ Z1 p: sin the article). The chemical shifts of the two carbons are 78.1 and " `8 J/ K6 T4 r2 d w3 n& n80.5. How to determine which carbon (C-6 or C-7) has the OAC group?

& {9 d: m! x5 U6 A
0 k, ^& s8 M2 H) | The auhors resovled the problem:
0 {, x' K4 `0 U! L3 z. ]6 L, h
# ?% S6 d9 n+ E& b- KIf C-6 (80.5) and C-7 (78.5) were right, meaning both the chemical* d: h; X$ ?1 b+ Q$ w4 u shifts of C-6 (79.3 to 80.5) and C-7 (76.2 to 78.5) were increased." X0 w. H" J# o; a0 G That assupmtion violates the above rule.
* x+ ~! w% }8 e" I1 T a8 ?0 a
$ @# z& n2 L3 @ So chemical shift of C-6 was not 80.5 but 78.5, chemical shift of C-7 was not 78.5 but 80.5.
% u, A- i: E2 y& N
' F2 H9 X( m; u( e7 ?4 H8 b C-6 (78.5) and C-7 (80.5) meaned that C-6 shifted to highfield (from7 d' f/ U/ ~& L4 i# i 79.3 to 78.5), C-7 shifted to lowfield (from 76.2 to 80.5). Logically,* E7 w: N5 V5 o+ y) P, s6 X7 t( k it was the C-7 with the OAC group (compound II), not the C-6 with the $ [- T2 w8 |$ E0 VOAC group (compound I).
) A7 `3 i. K% U* w( E7 O
% X: i( [% b/ U7 d5 t- {& `3 @+ aSimple, logic structural revision published in 1981!

- _# q; h# B8 w" D

  + z, d" z; c: g% Q* a
R8 z, _9 x; \

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?马上注册

×
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:17:25 | 显示全部楼层
 

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?马上注册

×
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:32:40 | 显示全部楼层
More example:

CH3CH2OH  chemical shift values: 18 (CH3), 58 (CH2).
CH3CH2OAc chemical shifts values: 14 (CH3), 60 (CH2).

These data should be remembered to remind the above rule.

alpha carbon 60>58;

belta carbon 14<18.

[em79][em79]
$ X1 Z. G2 w+ O$ X$ `
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-28 23:48:20编辑过]
: g r) d* ~/ x9 `' ^
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-31 10:07:36 | 显示全部楼层
受益匪浅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 马上注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|中国核磁共振论坛

GMT+8, 2025-12-28 05:17

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表