找回密码
 马上注册

扫一扫,访问微社区

搜索
热搜: mestrenova
楼主: 上善若水

请教这四种类似结构某个C化学位移的相对大小

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-5-28 16:27:12 | 显示全部楼层

4>3, 4>1

3>2,
1>2

3>1 (-OCO- alpha +56.5; belta +6.5; -OH alpha +49.0, belta +10.1) although 3 is close to 1

4>3>1>2

; Z- d% J6 @. O

according to your conclusion,maybe 3 is the  lowest

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 22:02:51 | 显示全部楼层
 Why?
The conclusion is 4>3>1>2.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:13:32 | 显示全部楼层
  On acetylation (OH group was changed to OCOCH3 group), the alpha ' H. T' `" A1 _9 i4 r0 zcarbon will show a downfield shift while the belta carbon will show a [/ d. `6 K2 L. Fupfield shif.
9 b/ a0 w# u# m* N# S- ~& _
$ X8 n' s7 q1 k1 H1 r See the following article how to revise a structure reported before just using the above rule!
$ O3 l' }5 m$ N
; s9 {' c& r* }. A$ ^6 F3 j One compound with C-6 OH, C-7 OH (compound IV in the article):  chemical shift values of C-6 79.3 ppm, C-7 76.2 ppm were known.
$ U! {( Z# h( m$ H2 G
# T8 ?' P5 n( {. xAnother compound with one OH group acetylated: it could be C-6 OAc, C-7 2 Z& h" ?4 }7 I4 |( KOH (compound I in the article) or could be C-6 OH, C-7OAc (compound II ! ?; B' F) U* P4 e4 vin the article). The chemical shifts of the two carbons are 78.1 and* ^$ a! I3 x) K% I+ @8 C( ?& n 80.5. How to determine which carbon (C-6 or C-7) has the OAC group?

- Q) q. Q" `8 f
( N0 b2 ` q8 f" D The auhors resovled the problem:
4 I8 E8 |% o1 x
, W8 ]2 L+ d% }9 o' a( i- E If C-6 (80.5) and C-7 (78.5) were right, meaning both the chemical 2 D2 R1 I& v" Y% ]shifts of C-6 (79.3 to 80.5) and C-7 (76.2 to 78.5) were increased./ Z+ {( q$ ]7 D( y2 M That assupmtion violates the above rule.
# T2 h' q5 |% J) k
/ y x# t( P2 T% u So chemical shift of C-6 was not 80.5 but 78.5, chemical shift of C-7 was not 78.5 but 80.5.
% V5 x0 U7 v; x: [$ \; i I! e- {5 Z
& w/ t- P- F: |. ` C-6 (78.5) and C-7 (80.5) meaned that C-6 shifted to highfield (from4 o% f8 E8 h' N5 ^1 q9 M. z9 J. G 79.3 to 78.5), C-7 shifted to lowfield (from 76.2 to 80.5). Logically, % O7 _4 `: _3 _" B; Mit was the C-7 with the OAC group (compound II), not the C-6 with the& C$ [( [. t% h OAC group (compound I).
" ?# d" Q& [5 k6 K8 @$ [
( q) S" S$ h- m0 {% SSimple, logic structural revision published in 1981!

6 _, O k1 p7 a. ^4 |

  , ^# r8 S+ {( [8 H+ F5 s. @! b
* u1 b1 u8 s4 G% T5 i2 W7 ]' c+ O

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?马上注册

×
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:17:25 | 显示全部楼层
 

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?马上注册

×
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-28 23:32:40 | 显示全部楼层
More example:

CH3CH2OH  chemical shift values: 18 (CH3), 58 (CH2).
CH3CH2OAc chemical shifts values: 14 (CH3), 60 (CH2).

These data should be remembered to remind the above rule.

alpha carbon 60>58;

belta carbon 14<18.

[em79][em79]
& G; P( Y: {5 h2 c. `
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-28 23:48:20编辑过]
# Y# `5 |' P7 Y x% }4 p/ |
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-31 10:07:36 | 显示全部楼层
受益匪浅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 马上注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|中国核磁共振论坛

GMT+8, 2025-11-9 18:05

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表